Loomis v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Loomis v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3035
BRUCE A. LOOMIS, JON C. STIERLE,
JOSEPH W. BURGE and RICHARD C. LEAVY,
Petitioners,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
Colin M. Lynch, Zazzali, Fagella, Nowak, Kleinbaum & Friedman, of Newark, New Jersey, argued for petitioners.
Jeffrey A. Gauger, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel; and Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel. Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3035
BRUCE A. LOOMIS, JON C. STIERLE,
JOSEPH W. BURGE and RICHARD C. LEAVY,
Petitioners,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board in CASE NO(S). PH0752060225-I-1, PH0752060226-I-1, PH0752060228-I-1,
and PH0752060237-I-1. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and
RADER, Circuit Judge)
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED June 10, 2008 _/s/ Jan Horbaly____________________
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished