In Re Prazoff
In Re Prazoff
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1069 (Reexamination Nos. 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344)
IN RE MICHAEL PRAZOFF
Edward D. Manzo, Cook, Alex, McFarron, Manzo, Cummings & Mehler, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant.
Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Robert L. McManus, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1069 (Reexamination Nos. 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344)
IN RE MICHAEL PRAZOFF
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences In CASE NO(S). 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, RADER and BRYSON, Circuit Judges):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATE: June 5, 2008 _ /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.