Ampex v. Eastman Kodak

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Ampex v. Eastman Kodak

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1089

AMPEX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, CHINON INDUSTRIES, INC.,

and ALTEK CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Jesse J. Jenner, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief were Norman H. Beamer, of Palo Alto, California, and James E. Hopenfeld, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was Karen A. Christiansen, of Palo Alto, California.

Michael J. Summersgill, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were William F. Lee, Donald R. Steinberg, Lauren B. Fletcher, and Jordan L. Hirsch, of Boston, Massachusetts, and S. Calvin Walden, of New York, New York. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware Judge Kent A. Jordan

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1089

AMPEX CORPORATION

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, CHINON INDUSTRIES, INC.,

and ALTEK CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In CASE NO(S). 04-CV-1373. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, DYK and MOORE, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATE: February 7, 2008________ _/s/ Jan Horbaly___________________

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished