Holley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Holley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential_ United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2010-3016 TRACLA|RE HOLLEY, Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in ATO752090463-l-‘l. ON MOTl0N 0 R D E R The United States Posta| Service moves to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. in this case, the Board’s decision involved the jurisdiction of the Board. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Accordingly, lT lS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The petitioners brief, if it has not already been filed, is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. The petitioners Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning

discrimination is also due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT DEC 1 0 2000 ,o___ _£'§/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horba|y CIerk cc: Trac|aire Holley (Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form enc|osed) Joseph A. Pixley, Esq. Michael Carney, Esq. s2O 2010-3016 2 Fll. 11-1 90U riEFrr€r.EE:sziz,~~ DEC 1 0 2009 .iHl't rlUKBALY Cl.ERK

Reference

Status
Unpublished