In Re Rackman
In Re Rackman
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1217 (Reexamination No. 90/007,353)
IN RE MICHAEL I. RACKMAN
Michael I. Rackman, Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for appellant.
Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Thomas L. Stoll, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1217 (Reexamination No. 90/007,353)
IN RE MICHAEL I. RACKMAN
Judgment ON APEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in CASE NO(S). 90/007, 353
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (BRYSON, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.)
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: November 4, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.