Bally Gaming Inc. v. Igt
Bally Gaming Inc. v. Igt
Opinion
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1072
BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IGT, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff- Appellee.
v. SIERRA DESIGN GROUP, Third Party Defendant.
Amy H. Candido, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were Charles K. Verhoeven, Eric E. Wall, and Todd Kennedy.
Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer Brown LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant/third party plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Nathaniel Hamstra and Andrea C.
Hutchison.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Senior Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr. NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1072 BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IGT, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff- Appellee, v. SIERRA DESIGN GROUP, Third Party Defendant.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in CASE NO(S). 3:06-CV-0483 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, BRYSON and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED October 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.