Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1039

MICHAEL BOWLING,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HASBRO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Rachel K. Zimmerman, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were Anthony R. Zeuli, Thomas J. Leach and Rachel C. Hughey.

David K.S. Cornwell, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Justin T. Sher and Kevin W. McCabe. Of counsel on the brief were Jeffrey K. Techentin and Adam M. Ramos, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C., of Providence, Rhode Island. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island Judge William E. Smith

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1039

MICHAEL BOWLING,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HASBRO, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-229 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED September 15, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished