U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2009

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 15, 2009

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1039 MICHAEL BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HASBRO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Rachel K. Zimmerman, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were Anthony R. Zeuli, Thomas J.

Leach and Rachel C. Hughey.

David K.S. Cornwell, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Justin T. Sher and Kevin W. McCabe. Of counsel on the brief were Jeffrey K. Techentin and Adam M.

Ramos, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C., of Providence, Rhode Island.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island Judge William E. Smith NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1039

MICHAEL BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HASBRO, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-229 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED September 15, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.