Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1039 MICHAEL BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HASBRO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Rachel K. Zimmerman, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were Anthony R. Zeuli, Thomas J.
Leach and Rachel C. Hughey.
David K.S. Cornwell, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Justin T. Sher and Kevin W. McCabe. Of counsel on the brief were Jeffrey K. Techentin and Adam M.
Ramos, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C., of Providence, Rhode Island.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island Judge William E. Smith NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1039
MICHAEL BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HASBRO, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-229 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED September 15, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.