In Re Rivera
In Re Rivera
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1123 (Serial No. 10/372,807)
IN RE RAYMOND R. RIVERA and CARL D. NEUBURGER
Bryan P. Collins, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Emily T. Bell.
Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Robert J. McManus, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1123 (Serial No. 10/372,807)
IN RE RAYMOND R. RIVERA and CARL D. NEUBURGER,
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in CASE NO(S). 10/372,807 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED August 11, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.