Cooley v. Dept. Of Homeland Security
Cooley v. Dept. Of Homeland Security
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3347 DARLENE COOLEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.
Lloyd Edward Tooks, of San Diego, California, argued for petitioner.
Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F.
Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel was Tara K. Hogan, Trial Attorney. Of counsel on the brief was Jerrold E. Rishe, United States Department of Homeland Security, of Los Angeles, California.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3347
DARLENE COOLEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board in CASE NO(S). SF0752080127-I-1 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, FRIEDMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 7, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.