Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc.
Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1590 RANDI BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CE SOIR LINGERIE CO., INC., BRAGEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., DILLARD’S, INC., FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., GAP, INC., THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., NORDSTROM, INC., and VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Gregory S. Dovel, Dovel & Luner LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Edward R. Schwartz, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, California, argued for defendants-appellees.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Magistrate Judge John D. Love NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1590
RANDI BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. CE SOIR LINGERIE CO., INC., BRAGEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., DILLARD’S, INC., FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., GAP, INC., THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., NORDSTROM, INC., and VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 2:06-CV-544 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 2, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.