Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd. [Revised]
Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd. [Revised]
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit * Revised: February 10, 2009 2008-1370 (Opposition No. 91/176,609)
HOLT’S COMPANY, Appellant, v.
VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED, Appellee.
M. Kelly Tillery, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.
*James W. Dabney, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Victoria J.B. Doyle and Mitchell Epner, and John F. Duffy, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
* Attorney’s name corrected.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1370 (Opposition No. 91/176,609)
HOLT’S COMPANY, Appellant, v. VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
Appellee.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in CASE NO(S). 91/176,609.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER Circuit Judges ) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED February 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.