Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co. v. Pocekovic

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co. v. Pocekovic, 329 F. App'x 273 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co. v. Pocekovic

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Pursuant to the court’s order of January 5, 2009, the appellant having failed to pay *275the filing fee for the appeals listed above within the time specified in the order,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) The appeals are dismissed.

2) Appellant’s motion for consolidation is moot.

B) The motion for extension of time filed by appellees Society for Prevention of Trademark Abuse and Jovan Pocekovie is moot.

Reference

Full Case Name
LEO STOLLER CENTRAL MFG. CO. v. Jovan POCEKOVIC, Appellee Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co. v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co.), and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Appellee Leo Stoller v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Leo Stoller), and The Southern New England Telephone Company, Appellee Leo Stoller v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), and Premium Products, Inc., Appellee Leo Stoller v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Leo Stoller d/b/a Central Mfg. Co.), and Sutech U.S.A., Inc., Appellee Leo Stoller, The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Leo Stoller), and George C. Kasboske, Appellee Leo Stoller v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), and Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc., Appellee Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co. v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC (substituted for Leo Stoller Central Mfg. Co.), and Loveland Products, Inc.
Status
Published