Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2009

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 11, 2009
346 F. App'x 592

Counsel

Andrew M. Federhar, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants and Counterclaim Defendant., David H. Pfeffer, Locke, Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellants’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal,*

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs.

It is not the court's usual practice to designate a voluntary dismissal as being with or without prejudice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.