Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit /

2009

1708 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinions from 2009.

  • Lewis v. United States 340 F. App'x 670, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Barnett v. Merit Systems Protection Board 341 F. App'x 639, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Ally v. Office of Personnel Management 341 F. App'x 636, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Gard v. Dept. Of Education (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Simundson v. Shinseki 340 Fed. Appx. 667, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Stanaszek v. United States Postal Service 339 F. App'x 999, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Dumont v. United States 345 F. App'x 586, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Pedeleose v. Department of Defense 343 F. App'x 605, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Simundson v. Shinseki 340 F. App'x 667, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Kwartler v. Department of Veterans Affairs 342 F. App'x 614, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Jemmott v. Shinseki 340 F. App'x 665, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Daniels v. Shinseki 341 F. App'x 634, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. 575 F.3d 1341, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Easter v. United States 575 F.3d 1332, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Morgan v. Dept. Of Energy (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Lisanti v. Office of Personnel Management 573 F.3d 1334, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Reilly v. Office of Personnel Management 571 F.3d 1372, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Tate v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Tompkins v. United States Postal Service 366 F. App'x 147, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Tompkins v. United States Postal Service 366 F. App'x 147, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr [Revised] (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Cornish v. Doll (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Four Rivers Investment, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Davis v. Merit Systems Protection Board 340 F. App'x 660, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 575 F.3d 1312, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Curtis v. Department of Justice 342 F. App'x 610, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Taylor v. United States Patent & Trademark Office 339 F. App'x 995, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Horizon Lines, LLC v. United States 341 F. App'x 629, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re United States (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Browder v. Shinseki 365 F. App'x 218, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Browder v. Shinseki 365 F. App'x 218, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Smith v. Shinseki 365 F. App'x 218, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Smith v. Shinseki 365 F. App'x 218, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hypolite v. United States 365 F. App'x 219, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hypolite v. United States 365 F. App'x 219, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr 574 F.3d 1403, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re McNeil-PPC, Inc. 574 F.3d 1393, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Commission v. United States 574 F.3d 1386, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Wilder v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United States 356 F. App'x 390, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United States 356 F. App'x 390, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re Scott 359 F. App'x 160, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re Scott 359 F. App'x 160, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Salman Ranch Ltd. v. United States 573 F.3d 1362, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Knight v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Sanofi-Aventis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. 356 F. App'x 388, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Sanofi-Aventis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. 356 F. App'x 388, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Parks v. Office of Personnel Management 356 F. App'x 389, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Parks v. Office of Personnel Management 356 F. App'x 389, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Lisanti v. Office of Personnel Management 573 F.3d 1334, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
« Prev 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 35 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑