NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1052 SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant- Appellant, v. DIAM USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.), Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants, v. TELEFONIX, INC., Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

Richard D. Harris, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff/cross claim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Herbert H. Finn, Kevin J. O’Shea, and Cameron M. Nelson.

Lee F. Grossman, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all appellees. With him on the brief was Mark M. Grossman, Grossman Law Offices, of Arlington, Illinois.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Judge Ronald A. Guzman NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1052 SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant- Appellant, v. DIAM USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.), Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants, v. TELEFONIX, INC., Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-4857.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly_________________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk