In re Kite & Hatton
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE PETER KITE AND DAVID HATTON
____________________ 2009-1579
(Serial No. 10/313,844)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT G. MUKAI, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was TRAVIS D. BOONE.
THOMAS J. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor.
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 21, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.