In Re R & R Investors
In Re R & R Investors
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Mutteb -t,tate5 Court of Zippeat5 for tbe jfeberat circuit
IN RE R&R INVESTORS (UPA PARTNERSHIP), CURTIS HOGENSON, DIANE LARSON, EILEEN M.
BERGER, and SHIRLEY J. ARVIDSON, PARTNERS, Petitioners.
Miscellaneous Docket No. 947
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 03-CV-2264, Judge Susan G. Braden.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
ORDER R&R Investors et al. (R&R) submit a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Federal Claims to (1) vacate a stipulation of voluntary dismissal, (2) grant R&R's motion to vacate and for recon- sideration, (3) rule on R&R's motion to substitute counsel, rule on R&R's motion for leave to intervene, and file R&R's notice of appeal.
Upon consideration thereof, IN RE R&R INVESTORS 2
IT Is ORDERED THAT: The United States and A.F.T.E.R. Incorporated et al. are directed to respond to R&R's mandamus petition within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.
F OR T HE C OURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly jitt 2 1 2010 Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
FI LED cc: Erick G. Kaardal, Esq. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE F EDERAL CIRCUIT Jeff H. Eckland, Esq.
Judge, Fed. Cl. JUL 2 1 2010 Clerk, Fed. Cl. s17 JAN HORBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.