King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service
King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 2010-3005 KAREN T. KING-ELLIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA0752090005-I-1.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MATTHEW J. DOWD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. On the brief was MORRIS E.
FISCHER, Law Office of Morris E. Fischer, of Bethesda, Maryland, MICHAEL P. GOODMAN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge , NEWMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 9, 2010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly________________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.