U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010

Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]

Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 10, 2010
Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plain,tiff-Cross Appellan,t,

V.

BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC.,

Defendan.t-Appellant.

2010-1377, -1400, -1408

Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- I'1€I'.

ON MOTION _ ORDER

The parties move jointly to stay briefing in these ap- peals pending this court’s disposition in Arlin,gt0n Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, In,c., 2010-102-5.

The parties state that these appeals and 2010-1025 involve the same parties, counsel, patent, and disputed claim tern1S, and that briefing in 2010-1025 is con1plete. The court agrees that a stay is warranted ARLlNGTON INDUSTRIES V. BRlDGEPORT 2

Accordingly,

IT ls ORDERED THA'r: (1) The motion is granted Arlington Industries, Inc. and Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. are directed to respond within 14 days of the issuance of the mandate in Arling- ton In,dus., Inc. v. Bridgep0rt Fittin,gs, In,c., 2010-1025 how these appeals should proceed. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear Arlin,gton In.dus., Inc. u. Bridgeport F1lttings, Inc., 2010-1025

FoR THE COUR'r

AUG 1 0 2010 lsi J an Horbaly

Date J an Horbaly

Clerk cc: Kathryn L. Clune, Esq.

Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. s 17 'iP.»a..mR

L C|RCU|T

AUE 100 2010

1mHoRsALv am = ih

§§ g$F

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.