Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]
Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plain,tiff-Cross Appellan,t, V. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendan.t-Appellant.
2010-1377, -1400, -1408 Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- I'1€I'.
ON MOTION _ ORDER The parties move jointly to stay briefing in these ap- peals pending this court’s disposition in Arlin,gt0n Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, In,c., 2010-102-5.
The parties state that these appeals and 2010-1025 involve the same parties, counsel, patent, and disputed claim tern1S, and that briefing in 2010-1025 is con1plete.
The court agrees that a stay is warranted ARLlNGTON INDUSTRIES V. BRlDGEPORT 2 Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THA'r: (1) The motion is granted Arlington Industries, Inc. and Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. are directed to respond within 14 days of the issuance of the mandate in Arling- ton In,dus., Inc. v. Bridgep0rt Fittin,gs, In,c., 2010-1025 how these appeals should proceed. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear Arlin,gton In.dus., Inc. u.
Bridgeport F1lttings, Inc., 2010-1025 FoR THE COUR'r AUG 1 0 2010 lsi J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Kathryn L. Clune, Esq.
Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. s 17 'iP.»a..mR L C|RCU|T AUE 100 2010 1mHoRsALv am = ih §§ g$F
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.