Arlington Industries v. Bridgeport [Order]
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit
ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Plain,tiff-Cross Appellan,t,
V.
BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC.,
Defendan.t-Appellant.
2010-1377, -1400, -1408
Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- I'1€I'.
ON MOTION _ ORDER
The parties move jointly to stay briefing in these ap- peals pending this court’s disposition in Arlin,gt0n Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, In,c., 2010-102-5.
The parties state that these appeals and 2010-1025 involve the same parties, counsel, patent, and disputed claim tern1S, and that briefing in 2010-1025 is con1plete. The court agrees that a stay is warranted ARLlNGTON INDUSTRIES V. BRlDGEPORT 2
Accordingly,
IT ls ORDERED THA'r: (1) The motion is granted Arlington Industries, Inc. and Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. are directed to respond within 14 days of the issuance of the mandate in Arling- ton In,dus., Inc. v. Bridgep0rt Fittin,gs, In,c., 2010-1025 how these appeals should proceed. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear Arlin,gton In.dus., Inc. u. Bridgeport F1lttings, Inc., 2010-1025
FoR THE COUR'r
AUG 1 0 2010 lsi J an Horbaly
Date J an Horbaly
Clerk cc: Kathryn L. Clune, Esq.
Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. s 17 'iP.»a..mR
L C|RCU|T
AUE 100 2010
1mHoRsALv am = ih
§§ g$F
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.