§ i.___m.»tna__ NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and RUDOLPH TECHNO_LOGIES, INC., Plain,tiffs-Appellees, v. CAMTEK LTD., Defendant-AppeIlant.

2010-1458 Appeal from the United St;ates District Court for the District of Minnesota in case no. 05-CV-1396, Chief Judge Michael J. DaviS.

ON MOTION Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

0 R D E R Camtek Ltd. submits a motion seeking a stay, pend- ing appea1, of paragraph 5(a) of the permanent injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Minnes0ta on August 28, 2009 or, in the alterna- tive, modification of the language of paragraph 5(a).

AUGUST TECH CORP V. CAM'l‘EK LTD 2 Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) August Technology Corporation et al. (August Technology) are directed to respond no later than August 18, 2010. (2) `The district court’s August 28, 2009 order is tem- porarily stayed to the extent that it enjoins offers to sell where the sale would be completed outside the United States, pending receipt of August Techn0logy’s response and consideration by the court of the papers FoR THE CoUR'r 1 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly z l Clerk cc: Jonathan S. Caplan, Esq.

Ernest W. Grumbles, lii, Esq. s17 H$lLED U.S. COU DF APPEALS FOR THE FEDEHAL ClRCUlT AUG l 'i 2010 JANHORBAL¥ CLEHK