NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CAS SANDRA TANNER, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

2010-3157 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DAO752090025-I-1.

ON MOTION ORDER We construe the petitioner’s notice of docketing as a motion to reform the official caption.

To the extent that the petitioner is seeking to reform the caption to designate the Ofi:ice of Pers0nal Manage- ment as a respondent, that request is denied.' The Merit * If petitioner is attempting to inform the court that her last name has changed to "Young," she should more clearly indicate that in writing to the court.

TANNER v. MSPB 2 Systen1s Protection Board's decision did not involve the Office of Personnel Management as a party Further, because the Board dismissed the underlying appeal for lack of jurisdiction, we designate the Board as the respon- dent. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2).

Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. The revised official caption is reflected above FoR THE CoURT AUG 25 wm /S/ Jan H@rba1y Date J an H0rbaly Clerk cc: Cas Sandra T:-inner ma °°UF§£S&§P, Antonia R. Soares, Esq. mg 'Lc|?;l[,8g'°R B. Chad B gard, Esq. ““ ms 2ev2o1u s19 1AN HORBAL¥ CLERK