Harari v. Mihnea
Harari v. Mihnea
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit (Interference No. 105,645) ELIYAHOU HARARI, ROBERT D. NORMAN, and SANJAY MEHROTRA, Appellants, V. ANDREI MII~INEA, JEFFREY KESSENICH, and CHUN CHEN, Appellees.
2010-1076 Appea1 from the United States Patent and Trademark Off1ce, B0ard of Patent Appea1s and Interferences.
ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of E1iyahou Harari et a1.’s unop- posed motions to lift the stay of proceedings and set the briefing schedu1e, IT ls ORDERED THAT: HARARI V. MIHNEA 2 The motions are granted The stay is lifted. The ap- pellants’ initial brief is due within 40 days from the date of filing of this 0rder.
FOR THE CoURT SEP 1 3 2010 /sf Jan Horbal__\[ Date J an H0rba1y C1erk cc: Timothy R. Volpert, Esq.
Thomas J. D’Amico, Esq. sl9 "~t.esfL'.Y:sen~~ SEP 18 2010 .|AN HORBAL¥ CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.