Priceplay, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Priceplay, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit PRICEPLAY, INC. (FORMERLY PERFORMANcE PR1c1NG, INc.), Plaintiff-Appellant, V. GOOGLE, INC. AND AOL LLC, ' - Defendants-Appellees.
2010-1306 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case n0. 07-CV-0432, Circuit Judge Randall R. Rader, sitting by designation ON MOTION ORDER Performance Pricing, Inc. moves without opposition for PricePlay, Inc. to be substituted for Perf0rmance Pricing, Inc. pursuant to Rule 43(b) of the Federal Ru1es of Appel1ate Procedure. The appellant also moves for a 21-day extension of tin1e, until November 15, 2010, to file its reply brief Accordingly, PRICEPLAY V. GOOGLE 2 IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to substitute is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The motion for an extension of time is granted FoR THE CoURT 3 1 ?9lU /S/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Gregory S. Dovel, Esq.
Charles K. Verhoeven, Esq. _ ”'°'rl-iEli s»zii<§l§?;'iiirF°"' UCT 2 1 film !AN HORBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.