NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1.

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MARTHA JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

2010-5143 Appea1 from the United States Court of Federa1 C1aims in 09-CV-146, Chief Judge Emi1y C. Hewitt.

ON MOTION ORDER Martha Jacobs submits an order of the United States District Court for the District of South Caro1ina which she states is a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We treat the document as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Jacobs’ appeal from a decision of the United States Court of Federa1 Claims was dismissed by this court on August 19, 2010 for failure to pay the docketing fee. The time to request reconsideration of that dismissal has JACOBS V. US 2 passed Fed. Cir. R. 45(a). Jacobs has not paid the dock- eting fee or submitted a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on this court's form. The district court order does not establish entitlement to in forma pauperis status in this court in an appeal of a different decisi0n, i.e., a decision of the Court of Federal C1aims.

Acc0rdingly, IT ls OR1)ERED THAT: The motion is denied.

FOR THE COURT T 2 2 010 2 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk _ cc: Martha Jacobs SteVen K. Uejio, Esq. s2O U.S. COUR`F"FEpPEALS FOR ms FEofu_L concur 0CT 22 2010 .lAN HORBALY CLERK