NOTE: This order is n011precedentia1.

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit IN RE BILL OF LADING TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM PATENT LITIGATION R&L CARRIERS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendcmt-Appellee, AND AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV'ICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND QUALCOMM, INC., MICRODEA, INC., DRIVERTECH LLC, PEOPLENET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND BERRY & SMITH TRUCKING LTD., ’ Defen,dants-Appellees, AND INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR COMPANY, Defendcmt-Appellee, AND PITT OHIO EXPRESS INC., R&L CARR1ERs v. INTERMEC TECH 2 Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1493, -1494, -1495, -1496 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in case nos. 09-MD-2050, 09- CV-0532, 09-CV-O818, 09-CV-0445, and 09-CV-0179, Senior Judge Sandra S. BeckWith.

ON MOTION ORDER R&L Carriers, Inc. submits a motion for leave to ex- ceed the word limitation and file an opening brief contain- ing up to 18,200 words.

0n October 22, R&L filed a brief of less than 14,000 wordS.

Upon consideration there0f, IT IS ORDERED THATI The motion is denied as moot.

FOR THE CoURT 0CT 2 9 2010 131 aaa nathan Da1:e Jan Horba1y C1erk §-§§ cc: Anthony C. White, Esq. EPPEALSFOR RAL ClRCU}T Thomas H. Shunk, Esq.

D0ug1as J. Wi11iams, Esq. []C]' 2 § 2[11[] JAN HORBALY CLERK s Jacob D. Koering, Esq.

Gregory F. Ahrens, Esq.

R&L cARR1ERs v. INTER.N;Ec TECH J0nathan S. Frank]in, Esq.

Michae1 L. DeVer, Esq.