U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010

Dnt, Llc. v. Sprint Spectrum, Lp.

Dnt, Llc. v. Sprint Spectrum, Lp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 29, 2010
Dnt, Llc. v. Sprint Spectrum, Lp.

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is 110np1'ecedential.

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit

DNT, LLC,

Plaintiff/ C0unterclaiman,t-Appellant, V.

SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP AND NEXTEL `

OPERATIONS, INC.,

Defen,clants-Appellees, and

CELLCO PARTNERSI-IIP (1)01NG BUs1NEss AS VER1z0N W1RELEss) AND ALLTEL

COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees, and

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendan,t-Appellee, and

UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION,

Defendcmt-Appellee, and

NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.,

C'0unterclaim Defendant-Appellee.

DNT v. sPRINT sPEcTRUM 2

2011-1001

Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 09-CV-O021, Chief Judge James R. Spencer.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The parties move for a 30-day extension of time; until Decen1ber 30, 2010, for DNT, LLC to file its opening brief until February 8, 2011, for Sprint Spectrum, LP, et al. to file their responsive briefs, and until February 22, 2011, for DNT, LLC to file its reply brief. - Upon consideration thereof

IT ls ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FoR THE CoURT

N9V 2 9 2010 /3/Jan H0rba1y

Date J an Horba1y

Clerk ccc Adam V. Fl0yd, Esq. n go

Michae1 J. Bettinger, Esq. u.s, cougar g¥AppEA;5 mg Kevin P. Anders0n, Esq. ' THE FEDER""'~ c'P5U'T Robert Edward Krebs, Esq. 0 »' 9 t 1

Ramsey M. A1-Salam, Esq. z 0

Anthony J. Dain, Esq. nw H0RBALY s2 1 cLERK

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.