Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2010-1003 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge Gary A. Feess. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S. CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L. ROSS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished