Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.
Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2010-1003 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge Gary A. Feess. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S. CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L. ROSS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished