Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.
Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Tech. Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2010-1003 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge Gary A. Feess. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee.
With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S.
CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L.
ROSS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.