NOTE: This order is n0nprecedentia1. “ United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MAX RACK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellan,t, V. HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendcmt-Appellee. 2010-1417 Appea1 from the United States District C0urt for the S0uthern District of Ohi0 in case n0. 05-CV-0784, Judge Michael H. Wats0n. ON MOTION ORDER H0ist Fitness Systems, Inc. moves "t0 allow the 10dgment of a 'Reduced Size‘ sample Pers0na1 Training System." Max Rack, Inc. reep0ndS. ' Up0n consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT:

MAX RACK V. HOIST FlTNESS 2 The motion is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear this case. Copies of the motion, resp0nse, and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel so that the panel can determine whether use of a reduced size sample is appropriate at oral argument FoR THE CoURT 1 5 2010 /s/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Jeffrey S. Stand1ey, Esq. J0hn L. Ha1ler, Esq. ‘~ - USDC, so 0H, clerk u.icnunF%%E?F-ns ma THE FEDERA|_ C|RCUI`l` s8 |JEC 1 5 2010 .lAN'l'WRBALY CLERK