Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

NOTE: This order is n0nprecedentia1. “ United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit

MAX RACK, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellan,t,

V.

HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendcmt-Appellee.

2010-1417

Appea1 from the United States District C0urt for the S0uthern District of Ohi0 in case n0. 05-CV-0784, Judge Michael H. Wats0n.

ON MOTION

ORDER

H0ist Fitness Systems, Inc. moves "t0 allow the 10dgment of a 'Reduced Size‘ sample Pers0na1 Training System." Max Rack, Inc. reep0ndS. ' Up0n consideration thereof

IT ls 0RDERED THAT:

MAX RACK V. HOIST FlTNESS 2

The motion is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear this case. Copies of the motion, resp0nse, and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel so that the panel can determine whether use of a reduced size sample is appropriate at oral argument FoR THE CoURT

1 5 2010 /s/ Jan Horba1y

Date J an Horba1y

Clerk cc: Jeffrey S. Stand1ey, Esq.

J0hn L. Ha1ler, Esq. ‘~ -

USDC, so 0H, clerk u.icnunF%%E?F-ns ma THE FEDERA|_ C|RCUI`l` s8 |JEC 1 5 2010 .lAN'l'WRBALY

CLERK