Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc., 658 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CORDANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cr0ss Appellan,t, V. AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant-Appellant. “ 2010-1502, -1545 _ ._0 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of DelaWare in case n0. 06-CV-0491, Mag'iStrate Judge Mary Patricia Thynge. ON MOTION ORDER The parties move for a 14-day extension of tirne, until February 4, 2011, for Amaz0n.co1n, Inc. to file its reply brief, and for a 7-day extension of time, until February 25, 2011, for Cordance Corporation to file its reply brief Up0n consideration thereof

BARD PERIPHERAL V. WL GORE 2 C.R. BARD, INC., Coun.terclcn'm Defendant, V. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/ C0un,terclaim,an,t-Appellee. 2010-1542 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in case no. 03-CV-0597, Judge_Mary H. Murguia. 4 v ON MOTION ORDER `_ Upon consideration of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D.’s motion to voluntarily with- draw its appeal, IT ls ORDERED THA'1‘: (1) The motion is granted The cross-appeal, 2010- 1542, is dismissed (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2010-1542. (3) The revised official caption for 2010-1510 is re- flected above

Reference

Status
Unpublished