Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit
CORDANCE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Cr0ss Appellan,t,
V.
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant. “
2010-1502, -1545 _ ._0
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of DelaWare in case n0. 06-CV-0491, Mag'iStrate Judge Mary Patricia Thynge.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties move for a 14-day extension of tirne, until February 4, 2011, for Amaz0n.co1n, Inc. to file its reply brief, and for a 7-day extension of time, until February 25, 2011, for Cordance Corporation to file its reply brief Up0n consideration thereof
BARD PERIPHERAL V. WL GORE 2
C.R. BARD, INC.,
Coun.terclcn'm Defendant,
V.
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant/ C0un,terclaim,an,t-Appellee.
2010-1542
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in case no. 03-CV-0597, Judge_Mary H. Murguia. 4 v
ON MOTION
ORDER `_
Upon consideration of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D.’s motion to voluntarily with- draw its appeal,
IT ls ORDERED THA'1‘: (1) The motion is granted The cross-appeal, 2010- 1542, is dismissed (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2010-1542. (3) The revised official caption for 2010-1510 is re- flected above
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.