Bard Peripheral Vascular v. WL GORE & ASSOCIATES
Bard Peripheral Vascular v. WL GORE & ASSOCIATES
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit BARD PER1PHERAL vASCULAR, 1Nc.
AND DAVID GOLDFARB, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendan,ts-Appellees, and - C.R. BARD, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, V. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.*, Defendcmt /Counterclaimant-Appellant.
2010-1510 Appea1 from the Ur1ited States Distriet C0urt for the DiStrict of Ariz0na in case n0. 03-CV-0597, Judge Mary H.
Murguia. _ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. AND DAVID GOLDFARB, M.D., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appel1ants, and BARD PERIPHERAL V. WL GORE 2 C.R. BARD, INC., Coun.terclcn'm Defendant, V. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/ C0un,terclaiman,t-Appellee.
2010-1542 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of A1‘izona in case n0. 03-CV-0597, Judge_Mary H.
Murguia. 4 v ON MOTION ORDER `_ Upon consideration of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D.’s motion to voluntarily with- draw its appeal, IT ls ORDERED THA'1‘: (1) The motion is granted The cross-appeal, 2010- 1542, is dismissed (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2010-1542. (3) The revised official caption for 2010-1510 is re- flected above.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.