U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010

Boston Edison Co. v. United States

Boston Edison Co. v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 5, 2010

Boston Edison Co. v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit BOSTON EDIS_ON COMPANY Plaintiff-Appellee, , and - ENTERGY NUCLEAR GENERATION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defen,domt-Appellant.

2010-5136, -5137 Appeals from the United States C0urt of Federa1 Clai1ns in consolidated case noS. 99-CV-447 and O3-CV- 2626, Judge Char1es F. Lett0W.

ON MOTION ORDER Boston Edison Co1npany, Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, and the Ur1ited States jointly move for an extension of ti1ne, until NoVe1nber 2, 2010, for Enterg'y to BOSTON EDISON COMPANY V. US 2 file its initial brief, for an extension of time, until Decem- ber 10, 2010, for Boston Edis0n to file its initial brief, for an extension of time, until December 29, 201(), for the United States to ila its reply brief, and for an extension of time, until January 17, 2011, for Entergy to file its reply brief.

Boston Edison Company and Entergy Nuclear Gen- eration C0mpany jointly move to stay the proceedings and toll the briefing schedule until the court rules on the joint time extension motion.

Up0n consideration there0f, IT ls OR:oERED THAT: 1) The joint motion to extend the briefing schedule is granted 2) The motion to stay the proceedings is de- nied as moot.

FoR THE CoURT NUv 5 mm /si Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Richard J ames C0nWay, Esq.

Michael B. Wa1lace, Esq. 1 ip man J. L0 R@, ESq. "-*T§gg§gQlAL,§§A¢b3r{°R nov 015 2010 1AN HORBALY CLERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.