Harari v. Mihnea
Harari v. Mihnea
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ELIYAHOU HARARI, ROBERT D. NORMAN, AND SANJAY MEHROTRA, AppelZants, _ V. ANDREI MIHNEA, JEFFREY KESSENICH, AND CHUN CHEN, AppeHees.
2010-1076 (Interference N0. 105,645) Appea1 from the United States Patent and Traden1ark Office, Board of Patent Appea1s and InterferenceS.
ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of E1iyah0u Harari, et al.’s unop- posed motion for a 28-day extension of time, until Novem- ber 22, 2010, to file their brief, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: HARARI V. MIHNEA The motion is granted 00T 2 0 2010 cc: Tim0thy R. V0lpert, Esq.
Th0mas J. D’Amic0, Esq.
S Date FoR THE C0URT /s/ Jan H0rba1y J an H0rba1y Clerk “m°2zzfH';nzzer“ 0CT 20 2010 .lANHORBALY 0LERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.