Tessera Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Tessera Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit TESSERA, INC., Appellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., Intervenors, and SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Interven,or, and ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., and POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION (n0w known as P0werchip Tech- nol0gy C0rp0rati0n), Interven0rs, and RAMAXEL TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Interven0r, TESSERA INC V. ITC 2 and K]NGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., Intervenor.
2010-1176 On appeal from the United States International Trade Con1mission in Investigation No. 337-TA-630.
ON MOTION Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
0 R D E R Tessera, Inc. moves for leave to file a reply brief not to exceed 12,000 words The intervenors oppose. Tessera replies.
Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is granted in part; Tessera's reply brief, not to exceed 10,000 words, is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.
FoR THE CoURT AUG 5 wm /3/Jan H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Morgan Chu, Esq.
G. Hopkins Guy, IIl, Esq.
Larry L. shacz@r, I1, ESq. va c0uR§,l,lF§lJ,EALSmR THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT AUG 05 2010 JANHORBALY 0LERK S Panyin A. Hughes, Esq.
Michael R. Levinson, Esq.
Joseph V. Colaianni, Esq.
Jonathan M. James, Esq.
TESSERA INC V. ITC
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.