Tessera Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit
TESSERA, INC.,
Appellant,
V.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee, and
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.,
Intervenors, and
SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Interven,or, and
ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., and POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION (n0w known as P0werchip Tech- nol0gy C0rp0rati0n),
Interven0rs, and
RAMAXEL TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,
Interven0r,
TESSERA INC V. ITC 2 and
K]NGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
Intervenor.
2010-1176
On appeal from the United States International Trade Con1mission in Investigation No. 337-TA-630.
ON MOTION
Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
0 R D E R
Tessera, Inc. moves for leave to file a reply brief not to exceed 12,000 words The intervenors oppose. Tessera replies.
Upon consideration thereof
IT ls 0RDERED THAT:
The motion is granted in part; Tessera's reply brief, not to exceed 10,000 words, is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.
FoR THE CoURT
AUG 5 wm /3/Jan H0rba1y
Date J an Horba1y
Clerk cc: Morgan Chu, Esq.
G. Hopkins Guy, IIl, Esq.
Larry L. shacz@r, I1, ESq. va c0uR§,l,lF§lJ,EALSmR THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT
AUG 05 2010
JANHORBALY
0LERK
S
Panyin A. Hughes, Esq.
Michael R. Levinson, Esq.
Joseph V. Colaianni, Esq.
Jonathan M. James, Esq.
TESSERA INC V. ITC
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.