U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010

Tessera v. International Trade Commission

Tessera v. International Trade Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 2, 2010
Tessera v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit

TESSERA, INC.,

Appellant,

V.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee, and

ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.,

Intervenors, and

SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Interven0r, and

ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., and POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION (n0w known as Powerchip Tech- nology C0rporati0n),

Interuen0rs, and

RAMAXEL TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,

Intervenor,

TESSERA INC V. lTC 2 and

KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,

Intervenor.

2010-1176 \

On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337 -TA-630.

ON MOTION

ORDER

PoWerchip Semiconduct0r Corporation moves to re- form the official caption. Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida lV[emo1~y (USA) Inc. (Elpida) move to withdraw Veronica S. Ascarrunz and Shaun R. Snader as counsel Upon consideration there0f,

IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) PoWerchip’s motion is granted The revised offi- cial caption is reflected above-). (2) Elpida’s motion is granted

FOR THE COUR'1‘ mm /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date J an Horbaly

Clerk cc: Morgan Chu, Esq.

G. HopkinS Guy, III, Esq.

Larry L. Shatzer, II, Esq. we 02 ama .lAN HORBAlY

OLW

S

Panyin A. Hughes, Esq.

Michael R. LeVinson, Esq.

Joseph V. Colaianni, Esq.

Jonathan M. James, Esq.

TESSERA lNC V. ITC

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.