U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010

Tessera v. International Trade Commission

Tessera v. International Trade Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 2, 2010

Tessera v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit TESSERA, INC., Appellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., Intervenors, and SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Interven0r, and ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., and POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION (n0w known as Powerchip Tech- nology C0rporati0n), Interuen0rs, and RAMAXEL TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Intervenor, TESSERA INC V. lTC 2 and KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., Intervenor.

2010-1176 \ On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337 -TA-630.

ON MOTION ORDER PoWerchip Semiconduct0r Corporation moves to re- form the official caption. Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida lV[emo1~y (USA) Inc. (Elpida) move to withdraw Veronica S. Ascarrunz and Shaun R. Snader as counsel Upon consideration there0f, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) PoWerchip’s motion is granted The revised offi- cial caption is reflected above-). (2) Elpida’s motion is granted FOR THE COUR'1‘ mm /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Morgan Chu, Esq.

G. HopkinS Guy, III, Esq.

Larry L. Shatzer, II, Esq. we 02 ama .lAN HORBAlY OLW S Panyin A. Hughes, Esq.

Michael R. LeVinson, Esq.

Joseph V. Colaianni, Esq.

Jonathan M. James, Esq.

TESSERA lNC V. ITC

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.