Morse v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.
Morse v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2010-303O CRA|G STEVEN N!ORSE, Petitioner, v. IV|ER|T SYSTEN|S PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent, and DEF’ARTNiENT OF HO|V|ELAND SECUR|TY, intervenor On petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT3330090571-l»1.
ON |V|OT|ON R D E R ' The Department of Home|and Security moves without opposition to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and moves for leave to intervene The Department also moves for an enlargement of 40 days from date of filing this order to tile its principal brief. The Department states that Morse opposes.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board The deciding agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case_ in this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent.
Accordingly, lT lS ORDERED TH/-\T: (1) The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected above (2) Within seven days of the date of filing of this order, Craig Steven i\/|orse is directed to serve or deliver two copies of his opening brief to counsel for the Board. (3) The Board and Department’s briefs are due within 50 days from the date of fiiing of this order FOR THE COURT FEB 25 2919 /swan Horbaiy g g cc: s2O Date Jan Horbaly Clerk Steven L. Herriok, Esq. nmb Scott D. Austin, Esq. u_s_ 4 - Jeffrey Gauger, Esq. “E2Lgg£€;*{P&%%l€"F0R FEB 25 2010 .lAN HORBAL¥ fRERK 2010-303O 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.