Eastern Awning Systems, Inc. v. Harolds Canvas and Awning, Inc.
Eastern Awning Systems, Inc. v. Harolds Canvas and Awning, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1449
EASTERN AWNING SYSTEMS, INC., and STEPHEN LUKOS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HAROLD’S CANVAS AND AWNING, INC., TOFF INDUSTRIES, INC., and HAROLD TOFFEY, Defendants-Appellees.
Patrick M. Fahey, Shipman & Goodwin LLP, of Hartford, Connecticut, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Lee A. Duval.
Thomas A. Parisot, Secor, Cassidy & McPartland, P.C., of Waterbury, Connecticut, for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Tara L. Shaw.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Judge Robert N. Chatigny NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1449
EASTERN AWNING SYSTEMS, INC., and STEPHEN LUKOS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HAROLD’S CANVAS AND AWNING, INC., TOFF INDUSTRIES, INC., and HAROLD TOFFEEY, Defendants-Appellees.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in CASE NO(S). 01-CV-912 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, Circuit Judges, and GUILFORD, District Judge).*
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 22, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
* The Honorable Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.