Fox v. Postmaster General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fox v. Postmaster General

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1376

TODD FOX and JANET FOX,

Appellants,

v.

John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,

Appellee.

David P. Hendel, Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Of counsel on the brief was Sarah M. Graves, Akerman Senterfitt LLP, of Vienna, Virginia.

David A. Harrington, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Appealed from: United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals Administrative Judge David I. Brochstein

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1376

TODD FOX and JANET FOX,

Appellants,

v.

John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,

Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals In CASE NO(S). 6159 and 6169. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED February 17, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished