Dietrich v. Kappos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Dietrich v. Kappos

Opinion

NOTE: This order is n0nprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ROLF DIETRICH, Appellan,t, V. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND SHIMANO, INC., Appellee. 2010-1530 (Reexaminati0n N0. 95/000,008) Appea1 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, B0ard of Patent Appea1s and In1;erferenceS. ON MOTION ORDER

DIETRICH V. SHIMANO INC 2 We construe the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s submitted “amended notice forwarding certified list” as an unopposed motion to reform the caption to name the Director as an additional party. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above. The Director’s brief is due within 40 days from the date of filing of this order. Rolf Dietrich may choose to file an amended reply brief. Any such amended reply brief is due within 14 days of service of the Director’s brief If the appellant does not submit an amended reply brief, then the case will proceed on the reply brief previously submitted by the appellant The joint appendix is due within seven days of the due date of the amended reply brief FOR THE COURT JAN 07 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date 5 an Horba1y Clerk cc: David C. Purdue, Esq. David L. Tarnoff, Esq. F||_£|} U. . Raymond T. Chen, Esq. on 819 am 0 7 2011 JAN HDRBALY CLERK

Reference

Status
Unpublished