U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2011

Russell v. United States

Russell v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 13, 2011
661 F.3d 1371 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Russell v. United States

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit

TAYLOR RUSSELL, oN BEHALF oF H1MsELF AND ALL oTHERs s1M1LARLY sI'rUATEI),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1498

Appea1 from the United States DiStrict Court for the Northern Dist1'ict of Ca1ifornia in case no. 09-CV-3239, Judge Wi]liam H. A1sup.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Tay1or Russe11 et a1. move without opposition for a 28- day extension of time, until Nove1:nber 22, 2010, to file their opening brief and for an extension of time for the United States to file its brief. The appellants also submit- ted an amended opening brief on December 14, 2010.

Upon consideration thereof,

RUSSELL V. US 2

IT ls 0RDERED THAT:

The motions are granted The clerk's office will dis- card the opening brief received on NoVe1nber 22, 2010 and will review the brief Eled on December 14, 2010 to deter- mine its compliance with the court's rules. The United States should calculate the due date for its brief from the date of filing of this order ‘

FOR THE COURT

1 3 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date J an Horbaly

Clerk cc: S. Chandler Visher, Esq.

FlLED

A1icia Hunt’ ESq_ u.S. collin 0F APFEAl.S FOR THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT

320 am 13 2011 .|AN HBRBAL‘(

CLENi

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.