Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALCESIA SRL, Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

and

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Intervenor. ____________________

2010-1156 ______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-643. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

WILLIAM ZEITLER, Law Offices of William Zeitler, of McLean, Virginia, argued for the appellant.

DANIEL E. VALENCIA, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for the appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.

KENNETH L. CHERNOF, Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the intervenor. With him on the brief was CARL S. NADLER. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 24, 2011 _____ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished