Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission
Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALCESIA SRL, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Intervenor. ____________________ 2010-1156 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-643. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM ZEITLER, Law Offices of William Zeitler, of McLean, Virginia, argued for the appellant.
DANIEL E. VALENCIA, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for the appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M.
LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.
KENNETH L. CHERNOF, Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the intervenor. With him on the brief was CARL S. NADLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 24, 2011 _____ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.