Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.
Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MAX RACK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2010-1417 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in No. 05-CV-0784, Judge Michael H. Watson. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY S. STANDLEY, Standley Law Group, LLP, of Dublin, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES L. KWAK, F. MICHAEL SPEED, JR. and MICHAEL R. STONEBROOK.
SUSAN B. MEYER, Gordon & Rees, LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JOHN L. HALLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished