U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2011

In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation

In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided March 8, 2011

In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, KBI-E, INC., KBI, INC., AND ASTRAZENECA LP, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES INC. (now known as Mylan Inc.), MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., LABORATORIOS DR. ESTEVE, S.A. and ESTEVE QUIMICA, S.A., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ 2010-1414 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Nos. 00-CV-6749, 03- CV-6057, M-21-81, and MDL no. 1291, Judge Barbara S.

Jones. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ERROL B. TAYLOR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs- appellees. With him on the brief were FREDRICK M.

ZULLOW, JOHN M. GRIEM, JR., and CHRISTOPHER J.

GASPAR.

JAMES H. WALLACE, JR., Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were MARK A. PACELLA and BRIAN H.

PANDYA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, MOORE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.