NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION ______________________________________________ SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________ RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC., MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH, INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. __________________ 2010-1415 __________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge James Ware. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for plaintiff- appellee were RICHARD D. KLINGLER and RACHEL H.

TOWNSEND. Also on the brief were RON E. SHULMAN, TERRENCE J.P. KEARNEY and RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees.

GARY M. HOFFMAN, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant and plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were KENNETH W. BROTHERS and ERIC OLIVER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk