Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit CEPHAL()N, INC., Plaintiff~Appellee, V. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., AND WATSON PHARMA, INC., Defen.dant-Appellan,ts. o 2011-1326, -1371 Appea1s from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 09-CV-0724, Judge Sue L. Robinson. Before PROST, Circu,it Judge. 0 R D E R Watson Pharn1aceuticals, Inc. et al. (Watson) moves to expedite these appeals Cepha1on, Inc. opposes. Wat- son replies Watson also moves without opposition to consolidate this appeal with its appeal no. 2011-1371. Watson may of course significantly self-expedite the case by Eling their briefs early. Watson has not shown that the time for Cephalon to file its brief should be
CEPHALON V. WATSON PHARMA 2 shortened. Cephalon should not anticipate any exten- sions of time to file its brief The case will be placed on the next available oral argument calendar after the briefing is completed, which is the usual course, and thus no motion is necessary to obtain that relief. Accordingly, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: (1) The motion to expedite is denied. (2) The motion to consolidate is granted - FoR THE CoURT HM _ /s/Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk - ca william F. Lee, ssa ¢,g1_¢0uR{',',l=§[,’,gm mg J ames K. Stronsk1, Esq. HE FE9-‘-`RAL ClRCUW 319 MAY 20 2011 .|AN|'$RBAl¥ 6|.ElIl
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished