Dietrich v. Kappos
Dietrich v. Kappos
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROLF DIETRICH, Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, and SHIMANO, INC., Appellee. __________________ 2010-1530 (Reexamination No. 95/000,008) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID C. PURDUE, Purdue Law Offices, LLC, of Toledo, Ohio, argued for appellant.
SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR., Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.
DAVID L. TARNOFF, Global IP Counselors, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee Shimano, Inc. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.