Dietrich v. Kappos
Dietrich v. Kappos
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ROLF DIETRICH, Appellant,
v.
DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee,
and
SHIMANO, INC., Appellee. __________________
2010-1530 (Reexamination No. 95/000,008) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DAVID C. PURDUE, Purdue Law Offices, LLC, of Toledo, Ohio, argued for appellant. SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR., Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.
DAVID L. TARNOFF, Global IP Counselors, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee Shimano, Inc. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished